Payments Academy
Buy now pay later PAYMENT OPERATIONS STARTED LIVE 01 Buy now - BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form ACTIVE 02 Why providers offer BNPL - provider likes it because the merchant fee QUEUED 03 BNPL flow in practice - works like this. QUEUED 04 Credit loss at 2.5 percent - If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent QUEUED 05 Customer receivable on the ledger - amount owed by the customer is a QUEUED 06 Affordability - common gap is failing to specify QUEUED BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form of short-term consumer credit offered at the point of sale, and it has grown rapidly because it is simple for the customer and profitable for the provider. Step 1 of 6 Buy now pay later STARTED Buy now BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form ACTIVE Why providers offer BNPL provider likes it because the merchant fee QUEUED BNPL flow in practice works like this. QUEUED Credit loss at 2.5 percent If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent QUEUED Customer receivable on the ledger amount owed by the customer is a receivable QUEUED Affordability common gap is failing to specify QUEUED BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form of short-term consumer credit offered at the point of sale, and it has grown rapidly because it is simple for the customer and profitable for the provider.
Why providers offer BNPL PAYMENT OPERATIONS IN PROGRESS LIVE 01 Buy now - BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE 02 Why providers offer BNPL - provider likes it because the merchant fee ACTIVE 03 BNPL flow in practice - works like this. QUEUED 04 Credit loss at 2.5 percent - If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent QUEUED 05 Customer receivable on the ledger - amount owed by the customer is a QUEUED 06 Affordability - common gap is failing to specify QUEUED The provider likes it because the merchant fee is higher than a card interchange fee, typically 3 to 6 percent, and because it acquires customers cheaply. Step 2 of 6 Why providers offer BNPL IN PROGRESS Buy now BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE Why providers offer BNPL provider likes it because the merchant fee ACTIVE BNPL flow in practice works like this. QUEUED Credit loss at 2.5 percent If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent QUEUED Customer receivable on the ledger amount owed by the customer is a receivable QUEUED Affordability common gap is failing to specify QUEUED The provider likes it because the merchant fee is higher than a card interchange fee, typically 3 to 6 percent, and because it acquires customers cheaply.
BNPL flow in practice PAYMENT OPERATIONS IN PROGRESS LIVE 01 Buy now - BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE 02 Why providers offer BNPL - provider likes it because the merchant fee DONE 03 BNPL flow in practice - works like this. ACTIVE 04 Credit loss at 2.5 percent - If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent QUEUED 05 Customer receivable on the ledger - amount owed by the customer is a QUEUED 06 Affordability - common gap is failing to specify QUEUED In practice the BNPL flow works like this. Step 3 of 6 BNPL flow in practice IN PROGRESS Buy now BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE Why providers offer BNPL provider likes it because the merchant fee DONE BNPL flow in practice works like this. ACTIVE Credit loss at 2.5 percent If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent QUEUED Customer receivable on the ledger amount owed by the customer is a receivable QUEUED Affordability common gap is failing to specify QUEUED In practice the BNPL flow works like this.
Credit loss at 2.5 percent PAYMENT OPERATIONS IN PROGRESS LIVE 01 Buy now - BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE 02 Why providers offer BNPL - provider likes it because the merchant fee DONE 03 BNPL flow in practice - works like this. DONE 04 Credit loss at 2.5 percent - If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent ACTIVE 05 Customer receivable on the ledger - amount owed by the customer is a QUEUED 06 Affordability - common gap is failing to specify QUEUED If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent, the loss becomes GBP 250,000 and the profit becomes a loss of GBP 30,000. Step 4 of 6 Credit loss at 2.5 percent IN PROGRESS Buy now BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE Why providers offer BNPL provider likes it because the merchant fee DONE BNPL flow in practice works like this. DONE Credit loss at 2.5 percent If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent ACTIVE Customer receivable on the ledger amount owed by the customer is a receivable QUEUED Affordability common gap is failing to specify QUEUED If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent, the loss becomes GBP 250,000 and the profit becomes a loss of GBP 30,000.
Customer receivable on the ledger PAYMENT OPERATIONS IN PROGRESS LIVE 01 Buy now - BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE 02 Why providers offer BNPL - provider likes it because the merchant fee DONE 03 BNPL flow in practice - works like this. DONE 04 Credit loss at 2.5 percent - If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent DONE 05 Customer receivable on the ledger - amount owed by the customer is a ACTIVE 06 Affordability - common gap is failing to specify QUEUED On the ledger, the amount owed by the customer is a receivable, the amount paid to the merchant is a payable that is settled immediately, Step 5 of 6 Customer receivable on the ledger IN PROGRESS Buy now BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE Why providers offer BNPL provider likes it because the merchant fee DONE BNPL flow in practice works like this. DONE Credit loss at 2.5 percent If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent DONE Customer receivable on the ledger amount owed by the customer is a receivable ACTIVE Affordability common gap is failing to specify QUEUED On the ledger, the amount owed by the customer is a receivable, the amount paid to the merchant is a payable that is settled immediately,
Affordability check gap PAYMENT OPERATIONS COMPLETE LIVE 01 Buy now - BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE 02 Why providers offer BNPL - provider likes it because the merchant fee DONE 03 BNPL flow in practice - works like this. DONE 04 Credit loss at 2.5 percent - If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent DONE 05 Customer receivable on the ledger - amount owed by the customer is a DONE 06 Affordability - common gap is failing to specify ACTIVE A common gap is failing to specify the affordability check, because the regulator will ask for it, and a BNPL provider that cannot show its checks will be found wanting. Step 6 of 6 Affordability check gap COMPLETE Buy now BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form DONE Why providers offer BNPL provider likes it because the merchant fee DONE BNPL flow in practice works like this. DONE Credit loss at 2.5 percent If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent DONE Customer receivable on the ledger amount owed by the customer is a receivable DONE Affordability common gap is failing to specify ACTIVE A common gap is failing to specify the affordability check, because the regulator will ask for it, and a BNPL provider that cannot show its checks will be found wanting.

Key points of this lesson, in order.

0:00 / 6:43 Step 1 of 6

BNPL: how buy now pay later works and where the risk sits

Cards compliance and acquiring, Lesson 7 of 8, Narration 6:43, D08 Cards and alternative payments

ReconciliationInterchangeSettlement

What you will learn

Your objective. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to explain bnpl: how buy now pay later works and where the risk sits and apply it to a real banking scenario.

Why it matters. For a business analyst, BNPL is a credit and collections subject.

Chapter objective: EMV, PCI DSS, merchant underwriting, interchange modelling and the chargeback chain

Key learning points

  • Buy now pay later
  • Why providers offer BNPL
  • BNPL flow in practice
  • Credit loss at 2.5 percent
  • Customer receivable on the ledger
  • Affordability check gap

Key terms

Reconciliation: The process of comparing records from two sources, such as a bank statement and an internal ledger, to confirm they agree.

Interchange: A fee paid by the acquirer to the issuer for each card transaction, set by the card scheme. It compensates the issuer for handling the transaction, funding the interest free period and managing fraud...

Settlement: The final movement of funds between banks to discharge obligations created by cleared payments. Settlement is usually made in central bank money or through correspondent accounts.

Payment flow diagram showing BNPL: how buy now pay later works and where the risk sits.

Practise this lesson

Exercise

Work out what the beneficiary receives for a GBP 300 payment under OUR, SHA and BEN.

Use the charge arrangement rules in this lesson and the correspondent and beneficiary bank fees named in the lesson.

  1. What to do. Calculate the amount credited under each of the three arrangements and state who pays each fee.

Correct result. Under OUR the sender pays all charges and the beneficiary receives the full amount. Under SHA the sender pays the sending charges and the beneficiary pays the receiving charges. Under BEN the beneficiary pays all charges and receives the amount less all fees.

Why. The charge arrangement decides who pays and how much arrives. A customer who was promised the full amount and receives less will complain, and the complaint lands on the analyst.

Check your understanding

Practice question

Which of the following best describes bnpl: how buy now pay later works and where the risk sits?

Takeaway and next step

What to remember

If the customer never pays, the provider writes off the GBP 200 it is owed, after deducting any late fees collected.

Follow GBP 300 through every stage, from instruction to beneficiary credit, and note where it can stop.

Open the Payment Lifecycle Simulator →

Builds on "Acquiring economics: pricing a merchant, MDR and the acquirer P and L".

Transcript and full text

Show transcript

BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form of short-term consumer credit offered at the point of sale, and it has grown rapidly because it is simple for the customer and profitable for the provider. The customer buys a product and pays in instalments, typically three or four payments over six to twelve weeks, usually with no interest if paid on time. The merchant is paid in full by the BNPL provider at the point of sale, minus a fee, and the provider collects the instalments from the customer. The provider bears the credit risk, the fraud risk, and the funding cost, and earns the merchant fee plus late fees from customers who miss a payment. The largest providers are Klarna, Afterpay and Affirm, and the model is now offered by banks and card schemes as well. Why BNPL exists is that it increases conversion for merchants and gives customers a way to spread the cost without a credit card. A merchant that offers BNPL typically sees higher conversion and a higher average order value, because the customer can buy a more expensive item and pay over time. The customer likes it because it is interest-free if paid on time and does not require a credit card application. The provider likes it because the merchant fee is higher than a card interchange fee, typically 3 to 6 percent, and because it acquires customers cheaply. The regulator concern is that BNPL is credit, and customers who use multiple BNPL providers can accumulate debt that no single provider can see, which is why the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions are bringing BNPL into regulation. The parties are the customer, the merchant, the BNPL provider, and the funding source. The customer selects BNPL at checkout and is credit-checked by the provider, usually with a soft check that does not affect the credit score. The merchant offers BNPL through the provider integration and is paid in full, minus the fee, when the customer completes the purchase. The BNPL provider pays the merchant, collects the instalments, and bears the loss if the customer does not pay. The funding source, which may be the provider own balance sheet or a warehouse facility from a bank, provides the money to pay the merchant before the instalments arrive. The card scheme is not involved, because BNPL is not a card payment, although some BNPL providers issue a virtual card to process the transaction. In practice the BNPL flow works like this. A customer buys a GBP 300 jacket and selects pay in three instalments. The provider runs a soft credit check and approves the purchase. The customer pays GBP 100 immediately, and the provider pays the merchant GBP 300 minus a 4 percent fee, which is GBP 288. The customer then pays GBP 100 in 30 days and GBP 100 in 60 days. If the customer pays on time, the provider earns GBP 12 from the merchant fee. If the customer misses a payment, the provider charges a late fee, typically GBP 6 to GBP 12, and may report the missed payment to a credit reference agency. If the customer never pays, the provider writes off the GBP 200 it is owed, after deducting any late fees collected. A worked example shows the economics. A BNPL provider processes GBP 10 million a month in purchases. The merchant fee averages 4 percent, so revenue is GBP 400,000. The funding cost is 1 percent, so the cost is GBP 100,000. The credit loss rate is 1.5 percent, so the loss is GBP 150,000. Operating costs are GBP 80,000. Profit is GBP 70,000, which is a margin of 0.7 percent. If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent, the loss becomes GBP 250,000 and the profit becomes a loss of GBP 30,000. This is why BNPL providers are obsessed with credit scoring: a one percentage point change in the loss rate can turn a profitable month into a loss, and the loss rate is the single most important number in the business. What happens when BNPL goes wrong is a customer harm issue, and the regulator is watching. If a customer uses BNPL with multiple providers, each provider sees only its own exposure, and the customer may accumulate debt it cannot repay. If the provider does not perform adequate affordability checks, it may lend to a customer who cannot pay, and the customer may be charged late fees that compound the debt. The United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority has consulted on bringing BNPL into regulation, which would require affordability checks, clear disclosure, and access to the Financial Ombudsman Service. A BNPL provider that does not prepare for regulation will face a costly remediation. The operational and accounting implications are that the BNPL provider must run a credit decisioning system, a collections system, and a funding facility. On the ledger, the amount owed by the customer is a receivable, the amount paid to the merchant is a payable that is settled immediately, and the credit loss is a provision that must be updated as the portfolio ages. The funding facility must be sized for the peak, because a BNPL provider that cannot pay its merchants on time loses them. The accounting team must also track the merchant fee as revenue, the funding cost as a cost, and the late fees as revenue, and must ensure that the revenue is recognised correctly: the merchant fee is recognised at the point of sale, while the late fees are recognised when they are charged. The finance team must also manage the funding facility, because the provider pays the merchant before it collects from the customer, so it needs working capital. For a business analyst, BNPL is a credit and collections subject. You must specify the credit decisioning rules, the affordability checks, the instalment schedule, the late fee rules, the collections workflow, and the reporting. You must also specify the merchant integration, the settlement timing, and the reconciliation between the merchant payments and the customer collections. A common gap is failing to specify the affordability check, because the regulator will ask for it, and a BNPL provider that cannot show its checks will be found wanting. Takeaway: BNPL is not a payment method, it is a credit product, and the credit loss rate is the business. Further reading: the Financial Conduct Authority BNPL consultation for the regulatory direction; Klarna and Afterpay merchant documentation for the operating model. Last reviewed 7 November 2026. A provider that grows fast without pricing the credit loss is buying volume with its own capital, and the capital runs out.

BNPL, buy now pay later, is a form of short-term consumer credit offered at the point of sale, and it has grown rapidly because it is simple for the customer and profitable for the provider. The customer buys a product and pays in instalments, typically three or four payments over six to twelve weeks, usually with no interest if paid on time. The merchant is paid in full by the BNPL provider at the point of sale, minus a fee, and the provider collects the instalments from the customer. The provider bears the credit risk, the fraud risk, and the funding cost, and earns the merchant fee plus late fees from customers who miss a payment. The largest providers are Klarna, Afterpay and Affirm, and the model is now offered by banks and card schemes as well.

Why BNPL exists is that it increases conversion for merchants and gives customers a way to spread the cost without a credit card. A merchant that offers BNPL typically sees higher conversion and a higher average order value, because the customer can buy a more expensive item and pay over time. The customer likes it because it is interest-free if paid on time and does not require a credit card application. The provider likes it because the merchant fee is higher than a card interchange fee, typically 3 to 6 percent, and because it acquires customers cheaply. The regulator concern is that BNPL is credit, and customers who use multiple BNPL providers can accumulate debt that no single provider can see, which is why the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions are bringing BNPL into regulation.

The parties are the customer, the merchant, the BNPL provider, and the funding source. The customer selects BNPL at checkout and is credit-checked by the provider, usually with a soft check that does not affect the credit score. The merchant offers BNPL through the provider integration and is paid in full, minus the fee, when the customer completes the purchase. The BNPL provider pays the merchant, collects the instalments, and bears the loss if the customer does not pay. The funding source, which may be the provider own balance sheet or a warehouse facility from a bank, provides the money to pay the merchant before the instalments arrive. The card scheme is not involved, because BNPL is not a card payment, although some BNPL providers issue a virtual card to process the transaction.

In practice the BNPL flow works like this. A customer buys a GBP 300 jacket and selects pay in three instalments. The provider runs a soft credit check and approves the purchase. The customer pays GBP 100 immediately, and the provider pays the merchant GBP 300 minus a 4 percent fee, which is GBP 288. The customer then pays GBP 100 in 30 days and GBP 100 in 60 days. If the customer pays on time, the provider earns GBP 12 from the merchant fee. If the customer misses a payment, the provider charges a late fee, typically GBP 6 to GBP 12, and may report the missed payment to a credit reference agency. If the customer never pays, the provider writes off the GBP 200 it is owed, after deducting any late fees collected.

A worked example shows the economics. A BNPL provider processes GBP 10 million a month in purchases. The merchant fee averages 4 percent, so revenue is GBP 400,000. The funding cost is 1 percent, so the cost is GBP 100,000. The credit loss rate is 1.5 percent, so the loss is GBP 150,000. Operating costs are GBP 80,000. Profit is GBP 70,000, which is a margin of 0.7 percent. If the credit loss rate rises to 2.5 percent, the loss becomes GBP 250,000 and the profit becomes a loss of GBP 30,000. This is why BNPL providers are obsessed with credit scoring: a one percentage point change in the loss rate can turn a profitable month into a loss, and the loss rate is the single most important number in the business.

What happens when BNPL goes wrong is a customer harm issue, and the regulator is watching. If a customer uses BNPL with multiple providers, each provider sees only its own exposure, and the customer may accumulate debt it cannot repay. If the provider does not perform adequate affordability checks, it may lend to a customer who cannot pay, and the customer may be charged late fees that compound the debt. The United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority has consulted on bringing BNPL into regulation, which would require affordability checks, clear disclosure, and access to the Financial Ombudsman Service. A BNPL provider that does not prepare for regulation will face a costly remediation.

The operational and accounting implications are that the BNPL provider must run a credit decisioning system, a collections system, and a funding facility. On the ledger, the amount owed by the customer is a receivable, the amount paid to the merchant is a payable that is settled immediately, and the credit loss is a provision that must be updated as the portfolio ages. The funding facility must be sized for the peak, because a BNPL provider that cannot pay its merchants on time loses them.

The accounting team must also track the merchant fee as revenue, the funding cost as a cost, and the late fees as revenue, and must ensure that the revenue is recognised correctly: the merchant fee is recognised at the point of sale, while the late fees are recognised when they are charged. The finance team must also manage the funding facility, because the provider pays the merchant before it collects from the customer, so it needs working capital.

For a business analyst, BNPL is a credit and collections subject. You must specify the credit decisioning rules, the affordability checks, the instalment schedule, the late fee rules, the collections workflow, and the reporting. You must also specify the merchant integration, the settlement timing, and the reconciliation between the merchant payments and the customer collections. A common gap is failing to specify the affordability check, because the regulator will ask for it, and a BNPL provider that cannot show its checks will be found wanting.

Takeaway: BNPL is not a payment method, it is a credit product, and the credit loss rate is the business. Further reading: the Financial Conduct Authority BNPL consultation for the regulatory direction; Klarna and Afterpay merchant documentation for the operating model. Last reviewed 7 November 2026. A provider that grows fast without pricing the credit loss is buying volume with its own capital, and the capital runs out.

Full lesson text (all scenes)

Completing a lesson updates your progress dashboard on the homepage.

Scene timestamps are estimated by allocating the narration text proportionally across the real audio length. The audio playback position is the source of truth: pause freezes the visual, seeking restores the correct scene, replay restarts the scene animation.